Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Toxicity Risks Associated with the Use of Untreated Pig Slurry as Organic Amendment by Farmers in the Commune of Kozah 1 (Togo)

Received: 19 July 2025     Accepted: 25 September 2025     Published: 17 October 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The increasing use of untreated pig slurry as an organic amendment in Kozah 1 (Togo) raises environmental and public health concerns. A preliminary survey revealed that 80% of farmers apply raw slurry directly to crops, while 20% discharge it into the environment, from where it is often collected by market gardeners. This study assesses the fertilizing potential and toxicity risks associated with such practices. Samples were collected from ten randomly selected pig farms in Lama canton, a zone dominated by small-scale artisanal pig farming. In each pit, stratified sampling targeted the surface, middle, and bottom layers using a sterile bucket mounted on a 1.5-meter pole. Each layer (500 mL) was homogenized into a composite sample per site. Samples were kept at 4°C until physico-chemical and microbiological analyses. The slurry showed a high organic matter content (730 ± 1.1 g/kgDM) and macronutrients (N = 21 ± 0.2, P2O5 = 25 ± 0.2, K2O = 38 ± 0.4 g/kgDM), but a low C/N ratio (5.2), indicating instability. Pathogens (E. coli, Salmonella) and elevated nitrate and phosphate levels were also detected, suggesting health and water pollution risks. The findings underscore the need for pretreatment methods such as co-composting to reduce pathogenic loads and stabilize nutrients for safer agricultural use.

Published in Science Journal of Chemistry (Volume 13, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.sjc.20251305.11
Page(s) 140-146
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Pig Manure, Toxicity, Organic Amendment, Urban Agriculture, Soil Pollution, Co-composting

References
[1] Somda, M. K., Kaboré, D., & Kinda, S. (2020). Caractérisation des effluents porcins et perspectives de valorisation en agriculture au Burkina Faso. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 14(2), 523-537.
[2] Houot, S., Garnier, P., Francou, C., & Chenu, C. (2005). Effets à long terme des amendements organiques sur les sols agricoles et leur productivité. INRA.
[3] Bolan, N. S., Adriano, D. C., & Mahimairaja, S. (2004). Distribution and bioavailability of trace elements in livestock and poultry manure by-products. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 34(3), 291-338.
[4] Guan, T. Y., & Holley, R. A. (2003). Pathogen survival in swine manure environments and transmission of human enteric illness: A review. Journal of Environmental Quality, 32(2), 383-392.
[5] Nicholson, F. A., Groves, S. J., & Chambers, B. J. (2005). Pathogen survival during livestock manure storage and following land application. Bioresource Technology, 96(2), 135-143.
[6] Hutchison, M. L., Walters, L. D., Avery, S. M., Munro, F., & Moore, A. (2004). A study of the fate of pathogens during composting of cattle and pig manure. Bioresource Technology, 91(2), 161–170.
[7] Diallo, A. K., Koné, D., & Coulibaly, L. (2022). Environmental risks of pig slurry mismanagement in peri-urban agriculture in Côte d’Ivoire. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194(6), 452.
[8] N’Dri, A. B., Yao, K. M., & Brou, Y. T. (2023). Livestock Manure Management and Diffuse Pollution in Agricultural Areas of Burkina Faso. African Journal of Environment and Agriculture, 10(2), 77-88.
[9] INSEED. (2022). 5e Recensement Général de la Population et de l'Habitat (RGPH-5). Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques et Démographiques.
[10] Traoré, A., Ouédraogo, S., & Compaoré, A. (2021). Influence of Pig Feeding on Slurry Composition in the Sahelian Zone. Tropicultura, 39(1), 15-23.
[11] AFNOR. (1982). Norme NF U 44-171. Détermination de la matière sèche et matière organique. Association Française de Normalisation.
[12] AFNOR. (1997). Qualité des sols - Méthodes d’analyse chimique. Association Française de Normalisation.
[13] Kelly, H. (2002). Microbial risks from livestock waste: Importance of treatment. Waste Management & Research, 20(2), 100-110.
[14] CEAEQ. (2014). Détermination du carbone organique total dans les solides: dosage par titrage (MA. 405 -C 1.1). Gouvernement du Québec.
[15] INRA. (2005). Référentiel de caractérisation des amendements organiques. INRA - Unité d’Agronomie de Laon.
[16] NF ISO 10390. (2005). Qualité du sol - Détermination du pH. AFNOR.
[17] AOAC. (1990). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International (15th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
[18] APHA. (1998). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (20th ed.). American Public Health Association.
[19] AFNOR. (2005). NF U 44-051. Amendements organiques, caractéristiques et prescriptions. Association Française de Normalisation.
[20] Rodier, J. (1978). L’analyse de l’eau: Eaux naturelles, eaux résiduaires, eau de mer (6e éd.). DUNOD.
[21] Smith, S. R. (2009). Organic waste management and environmental protection: Heavy metals. Waste Management, 29(10), 2720-2731.
[22] Gnahoua, G. M., Kouadio, L. E., & Yao, K. N. (2021). Effets des amendements organiques sur la structure du sol et les rendements maraîchers au Bénin. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 16(9), 1231-1240.
[23] Owusu, E. K., & Boateng, S. K. (2022). Use of pig manure compost improves soil aggregate stability and microbial activity in Ghanaian Alfisols. Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management, 13(3), 50-59.
[24] Sidibé, M., Coulibaly, Y., & Sangaré, M. (2021). Propriétés microbiologiques du lisier porcin utilisé en agriculture urbaine au Mali. Revue Malienne des Sciences et Techniques, 17(2), 97-108.
[25] Okonkwo, O. C., Eze, S. C., & Umeh, P. U. (2022). Health risks associated with raw pig manure used for vegetable production in southeastern Nigeria. Environmental Health Insights, 16, 1-10.
[26] Kpomassè, C. C., Goussanou, C. A., & Kpadé, C. P. (2019). Impacts sanitaires et environnementaux de la gestion des déjections porcines au Bénin. Revue de Géographie du Bénin, 16, 89-103.
[27] Moral, R., Moreno-Caselles, J., Perez-Murcia, M. D., & Hernández, T. (2005). Comparing the behaviour of heavy metals in two organic wastes before and after composting. Waste Management, 25(10), 1056-1066.
[28] McBride, M. B., Richards, B. K., & Steenhuis, T. (1998). Bioavailability and crop uptake of trace elements in soil columns amended with sewage sludge products. Plant and Soil, 203(1), 1-11.
[29] Alloway, B. J. (2013). Heavy Metals in Soils: Trace Metals and Metalloids in Soils and their Bioavailability (3rd ed.). Springer.
[30] Chadwick, D. R., Chambers, B. J., & Unwin, R. J. (2000). Livestock manure management strategies for minimizing water pollution: A review. Environmental Pollution, 103(1), 67-73.
[31] Sharpley, A. N., Chapra, S. C., Wedepohl, R., Sims, J. T., Daniel, T. C., & Reddy, K. R. (1994). Managing agricultural phosphorus for protection of surface waters: Issues and options. Journal of Environmental Quality, 23(3), 437-451.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Krou, N. M., Akpaki, O., Takin, M., Baba, G. (2025). Toxicity Risks Associated with the Use of Untreated Pig Slurry as Organic Amendment by Farmers in the Commune of Kozah 1 (Togo). Science Journal of Chemistry, 13(5), 140-146. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjc.20251305.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Krou, N. M.; Akpaki, O.; Takin, M.; Baba, G. Toxicity Risks Associated with the Use of Untreated Pig Slurry as Organic Amendment by Farmers in the Commune of Kozah 1 (Togo). Sci. J. Chem. 2025, 13(5), 140-146. doi: 10.11648/j.sjc.20251305.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Krou NM, Akpaki O, Takin M, Baba G. Toxicity Risks Associated with the Use of Untreated Pig Slurry as Organic Amendment by Farmers in the Commune of Kozah 1 (Togo). Sci J Chem. 2025;13(5):140-146. doi: 10.11648/j.sjc.20251305.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.sjc.20251305.11,
      author = {Nitale Mbalikine Krou and Ogouvidé Akpaki and Mponkrou Takin and Gnon Baba},
      title = {Toxicity Risks Associated with the Use of Untreated Pig Slurry as Organic Amendment by Farmers in the Commune of Kozah 1 (Togo)
    },
      journal = {Science Journal of Chemistry},
      volume = {13},
      number = {5},
      pages = {140-146},
      doi = {10.11648/j.sjc.20251305.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjc.20251305.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjc.20251305.11},
      abstract = {The increasing use of untreated pig slurry as an organic amendment in Kozah 1 (Togo) raises environmental and public health concerns. A preliminary survey revealed that 80% of farmers apply raw slurry directly to crops, while 20% discharge it into the environment, from where it is often collected by market gardeners. This study assesses the fertilizing potential and toxicity risks associated with such practices. Samples were collected from ten randomly selected pig farms in Lama canton, a zone dominated by small-scale artisanal pig farming. In each pit, stratified sampling targeted the surface, middle, and bottom layers using a sterile bucket mounted on a 1.5-meter pole. Each layer (500 mL) was homogenized into a composite sample per site. Samples were kept at 4°C until physico-chemical and microbiological analyses. The slurry showed a high organic matter content (730 ± 1.1 g/kgDM) and macronutrients (N = 21 ± 0.2, P2O5 = 25 ± 0.2, K2O = 38 ± 0.4 g/kgDM), but a low C/N ratio (5.2), indicating instability. Pathogens (E. coli, Salmonella) and elevated nitrate and phosphate levels were also detected, suggesting health and water pollution risks. The findings underscore the need for pretreatment methods such as co-composting to reduce pathogenic loads and stabilize nutrients for safer agricultural use.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Toxicity Risks Associated with the Use of Untreated Pig Slurry as Organic Amendment by Farmers in the Commune of Kozah 1 (Togo)
    
    AU  - Nitale Mbalikine Krou
    AU  - Ogouvidé Akpaki
    AU  - Mponkrou Takin
    AU  - Gnon Baba
    Y1  - 2025/10/17
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjc.20251305.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.sjc.20251305.11
    T2  - Science Journal of Chemistry
    JF  - Science Journal of Chemistry
    JO  - Science Journal of Chemistry
    SP  - 140
    EP  - 146
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-099X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjc.20251305.11
    AB  - The increasing use of untreated pig slurry as an organic amendment in Kozah 1 (Togo) raises environmental and public health concerns. A preliminary survey revealed that 80% of farmers apply raw slurry directly to crops, while 20% discharge it into the environment, from where it is often collected by market gardeners. This study assesses the fertilizing potential and toxicity risks associated with such practices. Samples were collected from ten randomly selected pig farms in Lama canton, a zone dominated by small-scale artisanal pig farming. In each pit, stratified sampling targeted the surface, middle, and bottom layers using a sterile bucket mounted on a 1.5-meter pole. Each layer (500 mL) was homogenized into a composite sample per site. Samples were kept at 4°C until physico-chemical and microbiological analyses. The slurry showed a high organic matter content (730 ± 1.1 g/kgDM) and macronutrients (N = 21 ± 0.2, P2O5 = 25 ± 0.2, K2O = 38 ± 0.4 g/kgDM), but a low C/N ratio (5.2), indicating instability. Pathogens (E. coli, Salmonella) and elevated nitrate and phosphate levels were also detected, suggesting health and water pollution risks. The findings underscore the need for pretreatment methods such as co-composting to reduce pathogenic loads and stabilize nutrients for safer agricultural use.
    
    VL  - 13
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections